Gallegos does not deny that it refused to meet the mobility requirement. On the contrary, it has raised a number of defences, including the argument that, in addition to the mobility agreements it has signed, the Agency has provided no evidence that the underlying targeted reallocation promotes the efficiency of the service. In this context, Mr. Gallegos argued that, in a case where it is a mobility agreement, the Agency must show the same thing as if there was no mobility agreement. The board rejected the applicant`s arguments and distinguished her case from Miller/. Interior, 119 MSPR 438 (2013). In this case, the board found that an agency must demonstrate, with the aid of overwhelming evidence, that a geographical reallocation of a worker who is not subject to a mobility agreement has been duly ordered because, in the interest of promoting the efficiency of the service, management can maintain a distance resulting from the non-acceptance of a directed reallocation. The allegation of non-compliance with a condition of employment has two elements that the Agency has had to demonstrate: (1) The requirement at issue is a condition of employment; and (2) the applicant did not meet this condition. Without evidence of bad faith or patent impartiality, the Chamber differs from the Agency`s requirements that must be met in order for a person to be appointed to or retain a specific position. The board found that the mobility requirement was a prerequisite for employment, as all of these positions were subject to the mobility requirement and Gallegos and his colleagues regularly signed mobility agreements. Source: I work for the government and we have mobility agreements.
Without mentioning the benefits of this proposal or any other, the idea of targeted redistribution in different sectors of the shuttle is worth discussing. Can the government force you to relocate or risk losing your job? Do they need congressional approval? Do you have to have a mobility agreement? What are the opportunities for employees when their jobs move, but they don`t want to participate? Complainant Gallegos was a forensic police officer with GS-13. As a condition of its commitment, Gallegos was required to execute a mobility agreement in which it recognized that any non-acceptance of a geographic reallocation could subordinate a separation from the federal service. In 2012, Gallegos reported on a targeted redistribution from Florida to Virginia. She objected to the reassignment and the Agency removed it by accusing it of “not fulfilling a condition of employment”. Hey guys, I offered a job with the government, but it depends on signing a mobility agreement that says they can relocate you during the training period and after the end of the workout. I was wondering how likely it was that he would be relocated or if someone was forced to move. Workers wishing to take positions subject to mobility agreements should be fully aware that any geographical non-reallocation could lead to expulsion without recourse.